Service
Data pipelines*
A script that works today is not a data pipeline. I build collection systems that keep running when a source changes its markup, blocks a request or throttles your range, and that store what they gather in a shape you can actually query.
Typical timeline
1 to 8 weeks
Pricing
Fixed or monthly
Reviews
5.0 from 148
Based in
Islamabad, Pakistan
Anyone can write a scraper that works once. The difficulty is the second month.
A source changes its markup and your selectors return empty strings, silently, for three weeks before someone notices the numbers stopped moving. A rate limit kicks in and jobs start failing without retrying. Storage grows into something nobody can query because the shape was never designed, only accumulated.
What you want is a system that keeps collecting, tells you when it breaks, recovers on its own where it can, and hands you data in a shape that answers questions later rather than only today.
Sources vary enormously in difficulty. A well structured public listing page and a heavily defended single page application are different projects, so I look before quoting.
| Project | Scale | Typical timeline | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| One off extract | A single source, a fixed dataset | 3 to 7 days | You need the data once, cleaned and delivered as a file or a table. No scheduling, no monitoring. |
| Monitored pipeline | One to three sources, running continuously | 2 to 5 weeks | Scheduled collection, retries, alerting when a source breaks, and storage designed for querying. The most common shape. |
| Monitoring product | Several sources, alerts to end users | 4 to 8 weeks | Everything above plus user facing saved searches and notifications, which turns a pipeline into something you can charge for. |
| Ingestion for an existing platform | Many sources, one canonical model | Scoped case by case | Reconciling several sources that name the same thing differently, into one model where counts can be trusted. |
01
A look at what you have
You tell me what you are building and what is in the way. I ask questions until I understand it, then tell you whether the project makes sense. This part is free and sometimes ends with me saying no.
02
A written scope and a number
Deliverables, timeline and price in writing before anything starts. The number does not move unless the scope does, and scope changes get quoted separately.
03
Build in the open
You get working builds you can click through, pushed regularly. No long silence followed by a surprise, so feedback lands while it is still cheap to act on.
04
Hand it over properly
A repository you own, documentation that gets a new developer running locally, and a recorded walkthrough of the deploy. Then a support window, because launch is when the real problems show up.
5.0
Average rating
148
Client reviews
23
Countries
31%
Came back
Every review is written by the client and shown unedited. You can read them all here or check them against the source.
Is this legal?
It depends on what you are collecting and from where, and it is worth settling before anyone writes code. I work with publicly accessible data, respect robots rules and rate limits, and keep collection paced so it does not burden the source. What I will not build is anything that needs someone else's login, bypasses authentication, or defeats bot protection to get at data that is not public. If your requirement depends on that, I am the wrong person, and I will say so on the first call rather than after you have paid.
What happens when a site changes its layout?
It will, and the system is designed on that assumption. Extraction is validated against what it produces, so a selector that suddenly returns empty raises an alert instead of writing nothing quietly. Extraction logic is also separated per source, so fixing one is a small change rather than a rewrite. On an ongoing arrangement I handle those fixes. On a fixed price build I document how to make them and record a walkthrough.
How do you handle getting blocked?
Mostly by not deserving it. Requests get paced per source, run through a queue rather than in parallel bursts, and back off when a source signals it wants less traffic. Politeness fixes most blocking, because most blocking is a response to volume. Where a source is behind serious bot protection, that is a case by case conversation and sometimes the honest answer is that the data is not reliably available.
How fresh will the data be?
You set that, and it drives the cost. Every fifteen minutes across three sources is a different system from once a day across one. On the monitoring products I have built, alerts reached users within seconds of a match appearing, which meant collection had to run continuously rather than on a schedule. Tell me how fresh it needs to be and I will tell you what that costs to run.
Where does the data live?
Usually PostgreSQL, because you will want to query it in ways you have not thought of yet and a relational schema handles that better than a pile of JSON files. Redis for the queue and for anything needing fast lookup. If you already have a warehouse you want it landing in, I write to that instead.
Can you add this to a product we already run?
Yes. I read your codebase and work to its conventions rather than bolting on something that only I understand. The ingestion side usually sits well as a separate service with a defined interface, which keeps it from tangling with the rest of your application and makes it easier to replace later.
What if an official API exists?
Then we use it, and I will check before quoting a scraper. An API is more stable, cheaper to run and less likely to break, so finding one is the best possible outcome for you even though it makes the project smaller. It happens more often than people expect, because the endpoint powering a site's own search is sometimes public and undocumented.
On how the work runs and what handover should include, whoever you hire.
Open to new work
Tell me what you are trying to build.
If I am the right person you will get a scope and a number in writing. If I am not, I will say so and point you somewhere better.